The ethics of expanding access to cheaper, less effective treatments

The Lancet:S0140-6736(15)01025-9 (2016)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
This article examines a fundamental question of justice in global health. Is it ethically preferable to provide a larger number of people with cheaper treatments that are less effective (or more toxic), or to restrict treatments to a smaller group to provide a more expensive but more effective or less toxic alternative? We argue that choosing to provide less effective or more toxic interventions to a larger number of people is favored by the principles of utility, equality, and priority for those worst-off. Advocates are mistaken to demand that medical care provided in low-income and middle-income countries should be the same as in high-income countries.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
PERTEO-22
Revision history
Archival date: 2016-08-27
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2016-08-18

Total views
209 ( #20,841 of 50,214 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
42 ( #14,532 of 50,214 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.