Analysis, schmanalysis

Canadian Journal of Philosophy 38 (2):pp. 289-299 (2008)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In Naming and Necessity, Saul Kripke employs a handy philosophical trick: he invents the term ‘schmidentity’ to argue indirectly for his favored account of identity. Kripke says in a footnote that he wishes someday “to elaborate on the utility of this device”. In this paper, I first take up a general elaboration on his behalf. I then apply the trick to support an attractive but somewhat unorthodox picture of conceptual analysis—one according to which it is a process of forming intentions for word use. This picture can recover a naturalistically respectable notion of the philosopher’s task, and can help resolve current debates that turn on the place of conceptual analysis.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
Reprint years
2009
ISBN(s)
0045-5091
PhilPapers/Archive ID
PETAS
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-03-23
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Conceptual Analysis and Reductive Explanation.Chalmers, David J. & Jackson, Frank
Is Experience Ubiquitous?Chalmers, David J.

View all 12 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
120 ( #18,945 of 37,099 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
23 ( #15,077 of 37,099 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.