Composition as pattern

Philosophical Studies:1-21 (forthcoming)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
I argue for *patternism*, a new answer to the question of when some objects compose a whole. None of the standard principles of composition comfortably capture our natural judgments, such as that my cat exists and my table exists, but there is nothing wholly composed of them. Patternism holds, very roughly, that some things compose a whole whenever together they form a "real pattern". Plausibly we are inclined to acknowledge the existence of my cat and my table but not of their fusion, because the first two have a kind of internal organizational coherence that their putative fusion lacks. Kolmogorov complexity theory supplies the needed rigorous sense of "internal organizational coherence".
PhilPapers/Archive ID
PETCAP-2
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-02-12
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Real Patterns.Dennett, Daniel C.
Mereology.Varzi, Achille C.
Free-Energy and the Brain.Friston, Karl J. & E. Stephan, Klaas

View all 24 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2018-02-12

Total downloads
197 ( #12,422 of 35,924 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
49 ( #6,753 of 35,924 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.