Illegitimate Values, Confirmation Bias, and Mandevillian Cognition in Science

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
In the philosophy of science, it is a common proposal that values are illegitimate in science and should be counteracted whenever they drive inquiry to the confirmation of predetermined conclusions. Drawing on recent cognitive scientific research on human reasoning and confirmation bias, I argue that this view should be rejected. Advocates of it have overlooked that values that drive inquiry to the confirmation of predetermined conclusions can contribute to the reliability of scientific inquiry at the group level even when they negatively affect an individual’s cognition. This casts doubt on the proposal that such values should always be illegitimate in science. It also suggests that advocates of that proposal assume a narrow, individualistic account of science that threatens to undermine their own project of ensuring reliable belief formation in science.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
First archival date: 2018-12-09
Latest version: 4 (2020-09-21)
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
1,043 ( #4,769 of 65,596 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
160 ( #3,405 of 65,596 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.