The Challenges Raised by Comorbidity in Psychiatric Research: The Case of Autism

Philosophical Psychology 1:1-28 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Despite several criticisms surrounding the DSM classification in psychiatry, a significant bulk of research on mental conditions still operates according to two core assumptions: a) homogeneity, that is the idea that mental conditions are sufficiently homogeneous to justify generalization; b) additive comorbidity, that is the idea that the coexistence of multiple conditions in the same individual can be interpreted as additive. In this paper we take autism research as a case study to show that, despite a plethora of criticism, psychiatric research often continues to operate in accordance with this model. Then we argue that such a model runs into problems once facts about comorbidity are taken into account. Finally, we offer some suggestions on how to tackle the challenge raised by comorbidity and its impact on heterogeneity. To do so, we explore transdiagnostic stratification accounts and network models to show that combining these approaches can move us in the right direction.

Author Profiles

Agustin Vicente
University of the Basque Country
Valentina Petrolini
University of the Basque Country

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-04-02

Downloads
166 (#45,810)

6 months
117 (#6,283)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?