The procedural epistemic value of deliberation

Synthese 190 (7):1253-1266 (2013)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Collective deliberation is fuelled by disagreements and its epistemic value depends, inter alia, on how the participants respond to each other in disagreements. I use this accountability thesis to argue that deliberation may be valued not just instrumentally but also for its procedural features. The instrumental epistemic value of deliberation depends on whether it leads to more or less accurate beliefs among the participants. The procedural epistemic value of deliberation hinges on the relationships of mutual accountability that characterize appropriately conducted deliberation. I will argue that it only comes into view from the second-person standpoint. I shall explain what the second-person standpoint in the epistemic context entails and how it compares to Stephen Darwall’s interpretation of the second-person standpoint in ethics
PhilPapers/Archive ID
PETTPE-2
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-11-21
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

View all 21 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
The Uniqueness Thesis.Kopec, Matthew & Titelbaum, Michael

View all 9 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index
2012-05-09

Total views
605 ( #4,049 of 40,685 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
105 ( #4,252 of 40,685 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.