Republican Theory and Criminal Punishment

Utilitas 9 (1):59 (1997)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Suppose we embrace the republican ideal of freedom as non-domination: freedom as immunity to arbitrary interference. In that case those acts that call uncontroversially for criminalization will usually be objectionable on three grounds: the offender assumes a dominating position in relation to the victim, the offender reduces the range or ease of undominated choice on the part of the victim, and the offender raises a spectre of domination for others like the victim. And in that case, so it appears, the obvious role for punishment will be, so far as possible, to undo such evils: to rectify the effects of the crime that make it a repugnant republican act. This paper explores this theory of punishment as rectification, contrasting it with better established utilitarian and retributivist approaches
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
PHIRTA
Upload history
Archival date: 2017-07-12
View other versions
Added to PP index
2010-08-30

Total views
165 ( #25,226 of 51,218 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #46,581 of 51,218 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.