Republican Theory and Criminal Punishment

Utilitas 9 (1):59 (1997)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Suppose we embrace the republican ideal of freedom as non-domination: freedom as immunity to arbitrary interference. In that case those acts that call uncontroversially for criminalization will usually be objectionable on three grounds: the offender assumes a dominating position in relation to the victim, the offender reduces the range or ease of undominated choice on the part of the victim, and the offender raises a spectre of domination for others like the victim. And in that case, so it appears, the obvious role for punishment will be, so far as possible, to undo such evils: to rectify the effects of the crime that make it a repugnant republican act. This paper explores this theory of punishment as rectification, contrasting it with better established utilitarian and retributivist approaches
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
PHIRTA
Revision history
Archival date: 2017-07-12
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Freedom as Antipower.Pettit, Philip

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2010-08-30

Total views
148 ( #20,061 of 41,641 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
31 ( #19,661 of 41,641 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.