Glasgow's Race Antirealism: Experimental Philosophy and Thought Experiments

Journal of Social Philosophy 44 (2):146-168 (2013)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Joshua Glasgow argues against the existence of races. His experimental philosophy asks subjects questions involving racial categorization to discover the ordinary concept of race at work in their judgments. The results show conflicting information about the concept of race, and Glasgow concludes that the ordinary concept of race is inconsistent. I conclude, rather, that Glasgow’s results fit perfectly fine with a social-kind view of races as real social entities. He also presents thought experiments to show that social-kind views give the wrong results, but intuitions might differ on which results are the wrong ones, and social-kind views can resist the implications he derives from these cases. Widespread false beliefs about a concept or category need not undermine anything’s existence, and a sufficiently context-sensitive approach to races will allow for competing criteria for race-membership in different contexts without contradictory criteria in any one context. Glasgow’s arguments are therefore unsuccessful.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
PIEGRA
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-11-21
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
The Ordinary Concept of Race.Hardimon, Michael O.
Race as a Human Kind.Sundstrom, Ron

View all 7 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2013-03-19

Total views
504 ( #8,039 of 50,241 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
54 ( #10,599 of 50,241 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.