Do we need an extended evolutionary synthesis?

Evolution 61 (12):2743-2749 (2007)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The Modern Synthesis (MS) is the current paradigm in evolutionary biology. It was actually built by expanding on the conceptual foundations laid out by its predecessors, Darwinism and neo-Darwinism. For sometime now there has been talk of a new Extended Evolutionary Synthesis (EES), and this article begins to outline why we may need such an extension, and how it may come about. As philosopher Karl Popper has noticed, the current evolutionary theory is a theory of genes, and we still lack a theory of forms. The field began, in fact, as a theory of forms in Darwin’s days, and the major goal that an EES will aim for is a unification of our theories of genes and of forms. This may be achieved through an organic grafting of novel concepts onto the foundational structure of the MS, particularly evolvability, phenotypic plasticity, epigenetic inheritance, complexity theory, and the theory of evolution in highly dimensional adaptive landscapes.
Categories
PhilPapers/Archive ID
PIGDWN
Upload history
First archival date: 2015-11-21
Latest version: 2 (2015-12-14)
View other versions
Added to PP index
2012-02-01

Total views
1,872 ( #1,261 of 52,746 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
146 ( #2,975 of 52,746 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.