The demarcation problem: a (belated) response to Laudan

In Massimo Pigliucci & Maarten Boudry (eds.), Philosophy of Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem. University of Chicago Press. pp. 9 (2013)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The “demarcation problem,” the issue of how to separate science from pseu- doscience, has been around since fall 1919—at least according to Karl Pop- per’s (1957) recollection of when he first started thinking about it. In Popper’s mind, the demarcation problem was intimately linked with one of the most vexing issues in philosophy of science, David Hume’s problem of induction (Vickers 2010) and, in particular, Hume’s contention that induction cannot be logically justified by appealing to the fact that “it works,” as that in itself is an inductive argument, thereby potentially plunging the philosopher straight into the abyss of a viciously circular argument.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
PIGTDP
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-11-21
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Philosophical Investigations.Wittgenstein, Ludwig
Two Dogmas of Empiricism.Quine, Willard V. O.
Philosophical investigations.Wittgenstein, Ludwig & Anscombe, G. E. M.

View all 29 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 11 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index
2013-09-12

Total views
2,525 ( #702 of 48,823 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
231 ( #1,751 of 48,823 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.