The demarcation problem: a (belated) response to Laudan

In Massimo Pigliucci & Maarten Boudry (eds.), Philosophy of Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem. University of Chicago Press. pp. 9 (2013)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The “demarcation problem,” the issue of how to separate science from pseu- doscience, has been around since fall 1919—at least according to Karl Pop- per’s (1957) recollection of when he first started thinking about it. In Popper’s mind, the demarcation problem was intimately linked with one of the most vexing issues in philosophy of science, David Hume’s problem of induction (Vickers 2010) and, in particular, Hume’s contention that induction cannot be logically justified by appealing to the fact that “it works,” as that in itself is an inductive argument, thereby potentially plunging the philosopher straight into the abyss of a viciously circular argument.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
PIGTDP
Upload history
Archival date: 2015-11-21
View other versions
Added to PP index
2013-09-12

Total views
3,139 ( #626 of 54,701 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
594 ( #407 of 54,701 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.