The Fall and Rise of Dr. Pangloss: adaptationism and the Spandrels paper 20 years later

Trends in Ecology and Evolution 15 (2):66-77 (2000)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Twenty years have passed since Gould and Lewontin published their critique of ‘the adaptationist program’ – the tendency of some evolutionary biologists to assume, rather than demonstrate, the operation of natural selection. After the ‘Spandrels paper’, evolutionists were more careful about producing just-so stories based on selection, and paid more attention to a panoply of other processes. Then came reactions against the excesses of the anti-adaptationist movement, which ranged from a complete dismissal of Gould and Lewontin’s contribution to a positive call to overcome the problems. We now have an excellent opportunity for finally affirming a more balanced and pluralistic approach to the study of evolutionary biology.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
PIGTFA
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-11-21
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
An Organisational Approach to Biological Communication.Frick, Ramiro; Bich, Leonardo & Moreno, Alvaro
Genes `For' Phenotypes: A Modern History View.Kaplan, Jonathan Michael & Pigliucci, Massimo

View all 9 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index
2011-11-07

Total views
949 ( #1,757 of 38,907 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
80 ( #4,820 of 38,907 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.