Evil and God's Toxin Puzzle

Noûs 50 (2):88-108 (2016)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
I show that Kavka's toxin puzzle raises a problem for the “Responsibility Theodicy,” which holds that the reason God typically does not intervene to stop the evil effects of our actions is that such intervention would undermine the possibility of our being significantly responsible for overcoming and averting evil. This prominent theodicy seems to require that God be able to do what the agent in Kavka's toxin story cannot do: stick by a plan to do some action at a future time even though when that time comes, there will be no good reason for performing that action. I assess various approaches to solving this problem. Along the way, I develop an iterated variant of Kavka's toxin case and argue that the case is not adequately handled by standard causal decision theory.
Reprint years
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
First archival date: 2016-05-05
Latest version: 2 (2016-05-06)
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
536 ( #11,280 of 2,448,888 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
63 ( #9,626 of 2,448,888 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.