Kaplan Rigidity, Time, and Modality

Logique Et Analyse 31 (123-124):329-335 (1988)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Joseph Almog says concerning “a certain locus where Quine doesn’t exist…qua evaluation locus, we take to it [singular] propositions involving Quine [as a constituent] which we have generated in our generation locus.” This seems to be either murder, or worse, self-contradiction. It presumes that certain designators designate their designata even at loci where the designata do not exist, i.e., the designators have “Kaplan rigidity.” Against this view, this paper argues that negative existentials such as “Quine does not exist” are true only at ordered couples of loci (times or possible worlds) < l, l’ > such that the constituents of the truthmaker are the designatum itself from l and whatever corresponds to “does not exist” from l’.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
First archival date: 2015-11-21
Latest version: 2 (2016-12-09)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

View all 8 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
218 ( #18,187 of 46,328 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
49 ( #17,014 of 46,328 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.