Are Moral Judgements Adaptations? Three Reasons Why It Is so Difficult to Tell

South African Journal of Philosophy 36 (3):425-439 (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
An increasing number of scholars argue that moral judgements are adaptations, i.e., that they have been shaped by natural selection. Is this hypothesis true? In this paper I shall not attempt to answer this important question. Rather, I pursue the more modest aim of pointing out three difficulties that anybody who sets out to determine the adaptedness of moral judgments should be aware of (though some so far have not been aware of). First, the hypothesis that moral judgements are adaptations has been advocated in various different specificities and scopes, and on various different levels. Second, the three kinds of evidence that have most often been appealed to by discussants of this hypothesis require additional arguments. And third, there is significant reasonable disagreement about what moral judgements essentially are.
Categories
Reprint years
2017
PhilPapers/Archive ID
PLZAMJ
Revision history
First archival date: 2016-11-17
Latest version: 2 (2017-10-10)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture.Barkow, Jerome; Cosmides, Leda & Tooby, John (eds.)

View all 83 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2016-11-17

Total views
141 ( #21,920 of 42,970 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
11 ( #37,383 of 42,970 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.