A plea for minimally biased naturalistic philosophy

Synthese 196 (9):3841-3867 (2019)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Naturalistic philosophers rely on literature search and review in a number of ways and for different purposes. Yet this article shows how processes of literature search and review are likely to be affected by widespread and systematic biases. A solution to this problem is offered here. Whilst the tradition of systematic reviews of literature from scientific disciplines has been neglected in philosophy, systematic reviews are important tools that minimize bias in literature search and review and allow for greater reproducibility and transparency. If naturalistic philosophers wish to reduce bias in their research, they should then supplement their traditional tools for literature search and review by including systematic methodologies.
ISBN(s)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
POLAPF-2
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-01-19
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Doing Without Concepts.Machery, Edouard

View all 81 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2018-01-19

Total views
156 ( #19,288 of 41,572 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
55 ( #10,741 of 41,572 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.