Pretence and Echo: Towards an Integrated Account of Verbal Irony

International Review of Pragmatics 6 (1):127–168 (2014)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Two rival accounts of irony claim, respectively, that pretence and echo are independently sufficient to explain central cases. After highlighting the strengths and weaknesses of these accounts, I argue that an account in which both pretence and echo play an essential role better explains these cases and serves to explain peripheral cases as well. I distinguish between “weak” and “strong” hybrid theories, and advocate an “integrated strong hybrid” account in which elements of both pretence and echo are seen as complementary in a unified mechanism. I argue that the allegedly mutually exclusive elements of pretence and echo are in fact complementary aspects enriching a core structure as follows: by pretending to have a perspective/thought F, an ironic speaker U echoes a perspective/thought G. F is merely pretended, perhaps caricaturised or exaggerated, while G is real/possible.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
POPPAE
Revision history
Archival date: 2016-10-23
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Relevance.Sperber, D. & Wilson, D.
Meaning and Relevance.Wilson, Deirdre & Sperber, Dan
Truthfulness and Relevance.Wilson, Deirdre & Sperber, Dan

View all 20 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Irony and the Dogma of Force and Sense.Barker, Stephen J. & Popa-Wyatt, Mihaela

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2016-10-23

Total views
205 ( #16,625 of 43,016 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
62 ( #9,969 of 43,016 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.