Slurs, roles and power

Philosophical Studies 175 (11):2879-2906 (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Slurring is a kind of hate speech that has various effects. Notable among these is variable offence. Slurs vary in offence across words, uses, and the reactions of audience members. Patterns of offence aren’t adequately explained by current theories. We propose an explanation based on the unjust power imbalance that a slur seeks to achieve. Our starting observation is that in discourse participants take on discourse roles. These are typically inherited from social roles, but only exist during a discourse. A slurring act is a speech-act that alters the discourse roles of the target and speaker. By assigning discourse roles the speaker unjustly changes the power balance in the dialogue. This has a variety of effects on the target and audience. We show how these notions explain all three types of offence variation. We also briefly sketch how a role and power theory can help explain silencing and appropriation. Explanatory power lies in the fact that offence is correlated with the perceived unjustness of the power imbalance created.
Reprint years
2017, 2018
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2017-09-30
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
The Pragmatics of Slurs.Bolinger, Renée Jorgensen
Slurring Words.Anderson, Luvell & Lepore, Ernie
Not All Slurs Are Equal.Popa-Wyatt, Mihaela

View all 36 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
What is a Slur?Diaz-Legaspe, Justina

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
585 ( #5,743 of 46,294 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
107 ( #5,525 of 46,294 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.