Consequentializing Constraints: A Kantsequentialist Approach

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
There is, on a given moral view, a constraint against performing acts of a certain type if that view prohibits agents from performing an instance of that act-type even to prevent two or more others from each performing a morally comparable instance of that act-type. The fact that commonsense morality includes many such constraints has been seen by several philosophers as a decisive objection against consequentialism. Despite this, I argue that constraints are more plausibly accommodated within a consequentialist framework than within the more standard side-constraint framework. For I argue that when we combine agent-relative consequentialism with a Kantian theory of value, we arrive at a version of consequentialism, which I call 'Kantsequentialism', that has several advantages over the standard side-constraint approach to accommodating constraints. What’s more, I argue that Kantsequentialism doesn’t have any of the disadvantages that critics of consequentializing have presumed that such a theory must have.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
First archival date: 2021-07-18
Latest version: 21 (2021-07-31)
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
160 ( #33,415 of 2,439,568 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
160 ( #3,491 of 2,439,568 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.