Desert, Control, and Moral Responsibility

Acta Analytica 34 (4):407-426 (2019)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
In this paper, I take it for granted both that there are two types of blameworthiness—accountability blameworthiness and attributability blameworthiness—and that avoidability is necessary only for the former. My task, then, is to explain why avoidability is necessary for accountability blameworthiness but not for attributability blameworthiness. I argue that what explains this is both the fact that these two types of blameworthiness make different sorts of reactive attitudes fitting and that only one of these two types of attitudes requires having been able to refrain from φ-ing in order for them to be fitting.
Reprint years
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
First archival date: 2018-09-20
Latest version: 2 (2019-06-28)
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
374 ( #21,162 of 71,145 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
45 ( #18,190 of 71,145 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.