Desert, Control, and Moral Responsibility

Acta Analytica 34 (4):407-426 (2019)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In this paper, I take it for granted both that there are two types of blameworthiness—accountability blameworthiness and attributability blameworthiness—and that avoidability is necessary only for the former. My task, then, is to explain why avoidability is necessary for accountability blameworthiness but not for attributability blameworthiness. I argue that what explains this is both the fact that these two types of blameworthiness make different sorts of reactive attitudes fitting and that only one of these two types of attitudes requires having been able to refrain from φ-ing in order for them to be fitting.
Reprint years
2019
ISBN(s)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
PORDCA
Revision history
First archival date: 2018-09-20
Latest version: 2 (2019-06-28)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

View all 18 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2018-09-20

Total views
146 ( #24,653 of 46,407 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
63 ( #12,163 of 46,407 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.