Incompatibility Semantics from Agreement

Philosophia 40 (1):99-119 (2012)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In this paper, I discuss the analysis of logic in the pragmatic approach recently proposed by Brandom. I consider different consequence relations, formalized by classical, intuitionistic and linear logic, and I will argue that the formal theory developed by Brandom, even if provides powerful foundational insights on the relationship between logic and discursive practices, cannot account for important reasoning patterns represented by non-monotonic or resource-sensitive inferences. Then, I will present an incompatibility semantics in the framework of linear logic which allow to refine Brandom’s concept of defeasible inference and to account for those non-monotonic and relevant inferences that are expressible in linear logic. Moreover, I will suggest an interpretation of discursive practices based on an abstract notion of agreement on what counts as a reason which is deeply connected with linear logic semantics
PhilPapers/Archive ID
PORISF
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-09-13
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
The Logical Basis of Metaphysics.Dummett, Michael A. E.

View all 8 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
On the Elusive Notion of Meta-Agreement.Ottonelli, V. & Porello, D.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2010-07-03

Total downloads
69 ( #25,243 of 37,184 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
15 ( #20,940 of 37,184 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.