Judgement aggregation in non-classical logics

Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 27 (1-2):106-139 (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
This work contributes to the theory of judgement aggregation by discussing a number of significant non-classical logics. After adapting the standard framework of judgement aggregation to cope with non-classical logics, we discuss in particular results for the case of Intuitionistic Logic, the Lambek calculus, Linear Logic and Relevant Logics. The motivation for studying judgement aggregation in non-classical logics is that they offer a number of modelling choices to represent agents’ reasoning in aggregation problems. By studying judgement aggregation in logics that are weaker than classical logic, we investigate whether some well-known impossibility results, that were tailored for classical logic, still apply to those weak systems.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2018-09-13
View other versions
Added to PP

99 (#54,002)

6 months
8 (#65,160)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?