Judgement aggregation in non-classical logics

Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 27 (1-2):106-139 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX


This work contributes to the theory of judgement aggregation by discussing a number of significant non-classical logics. After adapting the standard framework of judgement aggregation to cope with non-classical logics, we discuss in particular results for the case of Intuitionistic Logic, the Lambek calculus, Linear Logic and Relevant Logics. The motivation for studying judgement aggregation in non-classical logics is that they offer a number of modelling choices to represent agents’ reasoning in aggregation problems. By studying judgement aggregation in logics that are weaker than classical logic, we investigate whether some well-known impossibility results, that were tailored for classical logic, still apply to those weak systems.

Author's Profile

Daniele Porello
UniversitĂ  degli Studi di Genova


Added to PP

176 (#55,142)

6 months
52 (#38,207)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?