Ranking judgments in Arrow’s setting
Synthese 173 (2):199-210 (2010)
Abstract
In this paper, I investigate the relationship between preference and
judgment aggregation, using the notion of ranking judgment introduced in List and Pettit. Ranking judgments were introduced in order to state the logical connections between the impossibility theorem of aggregating sets of judgments and Arrow’s theorem. I present a
proof of the theorem concerning ranking judgments as a corollary of Arrow’s theorem,
extending the translation between preferences and judgments defined in List and Pettit
to the conditions on the aggregation procedure.
Keywords
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
PORRJI-2
Upload history
Archival date: 2018-09-13
View other versions
View other versions
Added to PP index
2009-05-20
Total views
111 ( #36,262 of 55,922 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
8 ( #50,688 of 55,922 )
2009-05-20
Total views
111 ( #36,262 of 55,922 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
8 ( #50,688 of 55,922 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.