Cartesian Dualism and the Intermediate State: A Reply to Turner Jr

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In this paper, I propose to analyse two objections raised by Turner Jr in his paper “On Two Reasons Christian Theologians Should Reject The Intermediate State” in order to show that the intermediate state is an incoherent theory. As we shall see, the two untoward consequences that he mentions do not imply a metaphysical or logical contradiction. Consequently, I shall defend an Intermediate State and I shall propose briefly one metaphysical conception of the human being able to reply to Turner Jr’s objections.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
PRECDA-4
Upload history
Archival date: 2020-01-24
View other versions
Added to PP index
2020-01-24

Total views
80 ( #39,292 of 53,695 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
29 ( #23,180 of 53,695 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.