Cartesian Dualism and the Intermediate State: A Reply to Turner Jr

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In this paper, I propose to analyse two objections raised by Turner Jr in his paper “On Two Reasons Christian Theologians Should Reject The Intermediate State” in order to show that the intermediate state is an incoherent theory. As we shall see, the two untoward consequences that he mentions do not imply a metaphysical or logical contradiction. Consequently, I shall defend an Intermediate State and I shall propose briefly one metaphysical conception of the human being able to reply to Turner Jr’s objections.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
PRECDA-4
Revision history
Archival date: 2020-01-24
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2020-01-24

Total views
45 ( #40,941 of 47,221 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
45 ( #17,886 of 47,221 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.