Whether and Where to Give

Philosophy and Public Affairs 44 (1):77-95 (2016)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Effective altruists recommend that we give large sums to charity, but by far their more central message is that we give effectively, i.e., to whatever charities would do the most good per dollar donated. In this paper, I’ll assume that it’s not wrong not to give bigger, but will explore to what extent it may well nonetheless be wrong not to give better. The main claim I’ll argue for here is that in many cases it would be wrong of you to give a sum of money to charities that do less good than others you could have given to instead, even if it would not have been wrong of you not to give the money to any charity at all. I assume that all the charities under discussion here do positive good overall, do not cause harm, do not infringe rights, etc. What makes my main claim here particularly interesting is that it is inconsistent with what appears to be a fairly common assumption in the ethics of giving, according to which if it is not wrong of you to keep some sum of money for yourself, then it is likewise not wrong of you to donate it to any particular charity you choose. Roughly: if it’s up to you whether to donate the money, it’s also up to you where to donate the money. I challenge this common assumption.
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
Reprint years
2018
PhilPapers/Archive ID
PUMWAW
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-12-02
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
War and Poverty.Oberman, Kieran

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2016-08-22

Total downloads
66 ( #24,568 of 35,870 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
18 ( #17,448 of 35,870 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.