On a Failed Defense of Factory Farming

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Timothy Hsiao attempts to defend industrial animal farming by arguing that it is not inherently cruel. We raise three main objections to his defense. First, his argument rests on a misunderstanding of the nature of cruelty. Second, his conclusion, though technically true, is so weak as to be of virtually no moral significance or interest. Third, his contention that animals lack moral standing, and thus that mistreating them is wrong only insofar as it makes one more disposed to mistreat other humans, is untenable on both philosophical and biological grounds.
Reprint years
2017
ISBN(s)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
PUROAF
Upload history
Archival date: 2017-05-17
View other versions
Added to PP index
2017-05-17

Total views
1,392 ( #2,638 of 2,432,203 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
311 ( #1,344 of 2,432,203 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.