In David Bather Woods & Timothy Stoll (eds.),
The Schopenhauerian mind. New York, NY: Routledge. pp. 228-40 (
2023)
Copy
BIBTEX
Abstract
Anscombe counsels us to dispense with those moral concepts that presuppose a divine law conception of ethics, among which she numbers the concepts of “moral obligation and moral duty, […] of what is morally right and wrong, and of the moral sense of ‘ought’.” Schopenhauer made a similar point more than a century earlier, though his critique implicates a narrower range of concepts. Through reflection on his accounts of right and wrong and of duty and obligation, this chapter attempts to show that we can dispense with the imperative in ethics while retaining these notions, thus preserving a distinctively modern conception of morality.