A Conflict Between Indexical Credal Transparency & Relevance Confirmation

Philosophy of Science (forthcoming)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
According to the probabilistic relevance account of confirmation, E confirms H relative to background knowledge K just in case P(H/K&E) > P(H/K). This requires an inequality between the rational degree of belief in H determined relative to two bodies of total knowledge which are such that one (K&E) includes the other (K) as a proper part. In this paper, I argue that it is quite plausible that there are no two possible bodies of total knowledge for ideally rational agents meeting this requirement. Hence, the positive relevance account may have to be rejected.
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
PUSACB
Upload history
Archival date: 2020-09-16
View other versions
Added to PP index
2020-09-16

Total views
31 ( #50,039 of 53,660 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
31 ( #21,731 of 53,660 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.