No Double-Halfer Embarrassment: A Reply to Titelbaum

Analytic Philosophy (forthcoming)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
“Double-halfers” think that throughout the Sleeping Beauty Scenario, Beauty ought to maintain a credence of 1/2 in the proposition that the fair coin toss governing the experimental protocol comes up heads. Titelbaum (2012) introduces a novel variation on the standard scenario, one involving an additional coin toss, and claims that the double-halfer is committed to the absurd and embarrassing result that Beauty’s credence in an indexical proposition concerning the outcome of a future fair coin toss is not 1/2. I argue that there is no reason to regard the credence required by the double-halfer as any less acceptable than the one deemed required by Titelbaum.
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2021-09-24
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
63 ( #54,963 of 65,755 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
63 ( #12,557 of 65,755 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.