Nietzsche as a Critic of Genealogical Debunking: Making Room for Naturalism without Subversion

The Monist 102 (3):277-297 (2019)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
This paper argues that Nietzsche is a critic of just the kind of genealogical debunking he is popularly associated with. We begin by showing that interpretations of Nietzsche which see him as engaging in genealogical debunking turn him into an advocate of nihilism, for on his own premises, any truthful genealogical inquiry into our values is going to uncover what most of his contemporaries deem objectionable origins and thus license global genealogical debunking. To escape nihilism and make room for naturalism without indiscriminate subversion, we then argue, Nietzsche targets the way of thinking about values that permits genealogical debunking: far from trying to subvert values simply by uncovering their origins, Nietzsche is actively criticising genealogical debunking thus understood. Finally, we draw out the consequences of our reading for Nietzsche’s positive vision.
Reprint years
2019
PhilPapers/Archive ID
QUENAA
Revision history
First archival date: 2018-11-04
Latest version: 17 (2019-04-01)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Shame and Necessity.Williams, Bernard
Anti-Dühring.Engels, Friedrich

View all 48 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2018-11-04

Total views
256 ( #11,776 of 39,923 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
190 ( #1,832 of 39,923 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.