Is Quine a Verificationist?

Southern Journal of Philosophy 41 (3):399-409 (2003)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
For example, Cheryl Misak in her book-length examination of verificationism writes that ‘the holist [such as Quine] need not reject verificationism, if it is suitably formulated. Indeed, Quine often describes himself as a verificationist’.[iii] Misak concludes that Quine ‘can be described as a verificationist who thinks that the unit of meaning is large’;[iv] and when comparing Dummett and Quine, Misak states that ‘both can be, and in fact are, verificationists’.[v].
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
RAAIQA
Revision history
Archival date: 2016-01-23
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
310 ( #8,830 of 38,900 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
58 ( #7,089 of 38,900 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.