Theories of reference and the philosophy of science

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
It has sometimes been suggested that the so-called new theory of reference (NTR) would provide an alternative picture of meaning and reference which avoids the unwelcome consequences of the meaning-variance thesis and incommesurability. However, numerous philosophers of science have been quite critical towards the idea and NTR in general. It is argued that many of them have an over-simplified and, in part, mistaken understanding of what NTR amounts to. It is submitted that NTR, when correctly understood, can be an important ingredient in the realist toolkit for defending the rationality of science.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2016-01-23
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Representation and Reality.Stalnaker, Robert & Putnam, Hilary
Putnam’s Paradox.Lewis, David K.

View all 22 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
159 ( #21,056 of 43,932 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
24 ( #26,524 of 43,932 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.