Teon teoria ja historiallinen selittäminen

Tiede and Edistys 2011 (4):291-300 (2011)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The essay exa­mines the views expressed in von Wright's Explanation and Understanding (1971) on human action and historical events from the perspective of the recent philosophy of science. Connecting causal explanation tightly to covering laws, as von Wright does, is found to be problematic, and his Logical connection argument invalid. On the other hand, von Wright's sketched theory of causation which is based on the concept of manipulation proves to be on the right track in light of current knowledge. From this perspective, however, there is no obstacle for explaining human action causally. This is illustrated with two examples from historical research. Finally, von Wright's idea that a complete account of the historical past is never achieved, because the past can always be re-evaluated, is briefly discussed.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
RAATTJ
Revision history
Archival date: 2019-04-26
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2019-04-26

Total views
47 ( #42,782 of 50,159 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
18 ( #30,777 of 50,159 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.