Teon teoria ja historiallinen selittäminen

Tiede and Edistys 2011 (4):291-300 (2011)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The essay exa­mines the views expressed in von Wright's Explanation and Understanding (1971) on human action and historical events from the perspective of the recent philosophy of science. Connecting causal explanation tightly to covering laws, as von Wright does, is found to be problematic, and his Logical connection argument invalid. On the other hand, von Wright's sketched theory of causation which is based on the concept of manipulation proves to be on the right track in light of current knowledge. From this perspective, however, there is no obstacle for explaining human action causally. This is illustrated with two examples from historical research. Finally, von Wright's idea that a complete account of the historical past is never achieved, because the past can always be re-evaluated, is briefly discussed.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
RAATTJ
Upload history
Archival date: 2019-04-26
View other versions
Added to PP index
2019-04-26

Total views
65 ( #49,570 of 2,439,433 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #52,747 of 2,439,433 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.