The unbearable circularity of easy ontology

Synthese 199 (1-2):3527-3556 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper, I argue that Amie Thomasson’s Easy Ontology rests on a vicious circularity that is highly damaging. Easy Ontology invokes the idea of application conditions that give rise to analytic entailments. Such entailments can be used to answer ontological questions easily. I argue that the application conditions for basic terms are only circularly specifiable showing that Thomasson misses her self-set goal of preventing such a circularity. Using this circularity, I go on to show that Easy Ontology as a whole collapses.

Author's Profile

Jonas Raab
Trinity College, Dublin

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-11-27

Downloads
312 (#28,903)

6 months
80 (#12,376)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?