Advocacy and Genuine Autonomy: The Lawyer's Role When the Client Has a Right to Do Wrong

South Texas Law Review 40 (1):255-67 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Stephen L. Pepper argues that lawyers and clients often act together in ways that their moral convictions would prevent them from acting individually. In an attempt to address this problem, I explore the nature of the attorney's responsibility to help her client reach autonomous decisions. To do this, I review the work of some prominent medical ethicists on a parallel to Pepper's problem in doctor-patient relationships.

Author's Profile

Linda Radzik
Texas A&M University

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-05-31

Downloads
216 (#66,081)

6 months
58 (#71,658)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?