Societal-Level Versus Individual-Level Predictions of Ethical Behavior: A 48-Society Study of Collectivism and Individualism

Journal of Business Ethics 122 (2):283–306 (2014)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Is the societal-level of analysis sufficient today to understand the values of those in the global workforce? Or are individual-level analyses more appropriate for assessing the influence of values on ethical behaviors across country workforces? Using multi-level analyses for a 48-society sample, we test the utility of both the societal-level and individual-level dimensions of collectivism and individualism values for predicting ethical behaviors of business professionals. Our values-based behavioral analysis indicates that values at the individual-level make a more significant contribution to explaining variance in ethical behaviors than do values at the societal-level. Implicitly, our findings question the soundness of using societal-level values measures. Implications for international business research are discussed.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
Reprint years
2014
ISBN(s)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
RALSVI
Upload history
Archival date: 2019-11-22
View other versions
Added to PP index
2013-12-12

Total views
275 ( #18,405 of 54,566 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
120 ( #4,258 of 54,566 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.