Syntactic semantics: Foundations of computational natural language understanding

In James H. Fetzer (ed.), Aspects of AI. Kluwer Academic Publishers (1988)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
This essay considers what it means to understand natural language and whether a computer running an artificial-intelligence program designed to understand natural language does in fact do so. It is argued that a certain kind of semantics is needed to understand natural language, that this kind of semantics is mere symbol manipulation (i.e., syntax), and that, hence, it is available to AI systems. Recent arguments by Searle and Dretske to the effect that computers cannot understand natural language are discussed, and a prototype natural-language-understanding system is presented as an illustration.
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-11-21
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
To Think or Not to Think.William J. Rapaport - 1988 - Noûs 22 (4):585-609.

View all 10 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
626 ( #3,712 of 40,131 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
68 ( #7,026 of 40,131 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.