Yes, She Was!: Reply to Ford’s “Helen Keller Was Never in a Chinese Room”

Minds and Machines 21 (1):3-17 (2011)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Ford’s Helen Keller Was Never in a Chinese Room claims that my argument in How Helen Keller Used Syntactic Semantics to Escape from a Chinese Room fails because Searle and I use the terms ‘syntax’ and ‘semantics’ differently, hence are at cross purposes. Ford has misunderstood me; this reply clarifies my theory
ISBN(s)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
RAPYSW
Upload history
Archival date: 2015-11-21
View other versions
Added to PP index
2010-11-18

Total views
614 ( #6,360 of 51,728 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
34 ( #17,260 of 51,728 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.