King, Fuller and Dworkin natural law and hard cases

Economic and Social Thought (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The debate between natural law and positivist law has been received much attention. Ronald Dworkin exposes the limitation of positivist law through the argument of hard cases. This argument is furthered strengthened when we apply the interpretation of Martin Luther King Jr and the voluntarist natural law tradition, and Lon Fuller’s ‘procedural view’ and the application of the ‘principles of legality’.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-07-18

Downloads
379 (#55,795)

6 months
112 (#55,792)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?