Tye's criticism of the knowledge argument

Dialogue 34 (4):713-26 (1995)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A defense of Frank Jackson's knowledge argument from an objection raised by Michael Tye , according to which Mary acquires no new factual knowledge when she first sees red but, instead, merely comes to know old facts in a new way

Author's Profile

Paul Raymont
University of Toronto (PhD)

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
592 (#24,487)

6 months
78 (#48,452)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?