The Fodorian fallacy
Analysis 62 (4):285-89 (2002)
Abstract
In recent years Fodor has repeatedly argued that nothing epistemic can be essential to, or constitutive of, any concept. This holds in virtue of a constraint which Fodor dubs the Compositionality Constraint. I show that Fodor's argument is fallacious because it rests on an ambiguity.
Keywords
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
RECTFF
Revision history
Archival date: 2016-01-20
View upload history
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Learnability and Compositionality.Patterson, Douglas
The Notion of a Recognitional Concept and Other Confusions.Dahlgrün, Malte
Added to PP index
2009-01-28
Total downloads
204 ( #12,692 of 37,180 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #32,949 of 37,180 )
2009-01-28
Total downloads
204 ( #12,692 of 37,180 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #32,949 of 37,180 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.
