The Fodorian fallacy
Analysis 62 (4):285-89 (2002)
Abstract
In recent years Fodor has repeatedly argued that nothing epistemic can be essential to, or constitutive of, any concept. This holds in virtue of a constraint which Fodor dubs the Compositionality Constraint. I show that Fodor's argument is fallacious because it rests on an ambiguity.
Keywords
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
RECTFF
Upload history
Archival date: 2016-01-20
View other versions
View other versions
Added to PP index
2009-01-28
Total views
326 ( #19,849 of 2,448,669 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
9 ( #49,126 of 2,448,669 )
2009-01-28
Total views
326 ( #19,849 of 2,448,669 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
9 ( #49,126 of 2,448,669 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
