The Fodorian fallacy

Analysis 62 (4):285-89 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In recent years Fodor has repeatedly argued that nothing epistemic can be essential to, or constitutive of, any concept. This holds in virtue of a constraint which Fodor dubs the Compositionality Constraint. I show that Fodor's argument is fallacious because it rests on an ambiguity.

Author's Profile

Francois Recanati
Institut Jean Nicod

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
358 (#25,159)

6 months
15 (#58,845)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?