The Fodorian fallacy

Analysis 62 (4):285-89 (2002)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In recent years Fodor has repeatedly argued that nothing epistemic can be essential to, or constitutive of, any concept. This holds in virtue of a constraint which Fodor dubs the Compositionality Constraint. I show that Fodor's argument is fallacious because it rests on an ambiguity.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
RECTFF
Upload history
Archival date: 2016-01-20
View other versions
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
326 ( #19,849 of 2,448,669 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
9 ( #49,126 of 2,448,669 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.