Carbon Leakage and the Argument from No Difference

Environmental Values 24 (4):535-52 (2015)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Critics of carbon mitigation often appeal to what Jonathan Glover has called ‘the argument from no difference’: that is, ‘If I don’t do it, someone else will’. Yet even if this justifies continued high emissions by the industrialised countries, it cannot excuse business as usual. The North’s emissions might not harm the victims of climate change in the sense of making them worse off than they would otherwise be. Nevertheless, it receives benefits produced at the latter’s expense, with the result that it has more than it deserves, and that victims will have less. This enrichment is unjust; unjustly enriched agents ought to make compensation. The best form of compensation is vigorous action against climate change.
Reprint years
2015
PhilPapers/Archive ID
RENCLA-2
Upload history
Archival date: 2015-11-21
View other versions
Added to PP index
2014-07-20

Total views
291 ( #17,420 of 54,385 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
28 ( #25,265 of 54,385 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.