Form as Structure: It's not so Simple

Ratio 31 (1):20-36 (2018)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Hylomorphism is the theory that objects are composites of form and matter. Recently it has been argued that form is structure, or the arrangement of an object's parts. This paper shows that the principle of form cannot be ontologically exhausted by structure. That is, I deny form should be understood just as the arrangement of an object's parts. I do so by showing that structure cannot play the role form is supposed to in a certain domain of objects, specifically, in mereological simples. Thus, I show that Hylomorphism does not reduce to Structuralism. I also draw out some important consequences from my argument for Hylomorphism in general.
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
RENFAS
Upload history
Archival date: 2021-05-26
View other versions
Added to PP index
2016-10-13

Total views
89 ( #44,612 of 2,439,598 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
16 ( #38,124 of 2,439,598 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.