Form as Structure: It's not so Simple

Ratio 31 (1):20-36 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Hylomorphism is the theory that objects are composites of form and matter. Recently it has been argued that form is structure, or the arrangement of an object's parts. This paper shows that the principle of form cannot be ontologically exhausted by structure. That is, I deny form should be understood just as the arrangement of an object's parts. I do so by showing that structure cannot play the role form is supposed to in a certain domain of objects, specifically, in mereological simples. Thus, I show that Hylomorphism does not reduce to Structuralism. I also draw out some important consequences from my argument for Hylomorphism in general.

Author's Profile

Graham Renz
Marian University

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-10-13

Downloads
778 (#18,930)

6 months
236 (#10,375)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?