In Defense of Natural Religion

Religious Studies (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The dominance of the Abrahamic tradition in contemporary analytic philosophy of religion has led some to call for greater exploration of alternatives to the traditional conception of God, such as Pantheism, Ultimism, and Axiarchism. While we think this call for alternatives is important, we go in a different direction. Rather than explore and defend alternative conceptions of God, we defend a range of fairly traditional but non-religious conceptions of God. This range of views, from deism to philosophical theism, enjoys a variety of benefits over its religious competitors and deserves greater attention.

Author Profiles

Graham Renz
Marian University
William Bell
Washington University in St. Louis

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-10-18

Downloads
205 (#90,969)

6 months
205 (#14,801)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?