Quantification in the Ontology Room

Dialectica 73 (4):563-585 (2019)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
There is a growing movement towards construing some classic debates in ontology as meaningless, either because the answers seem obvious or the debates seem intractable. In this paper, I respond to this movement. The response has three components: First, the members of the two sides of the ontological debates that dismissivists have targeted are using different quantifiers. Second, the austere ontologist is using a more fundamental quantifier than her opponent. Third, the austere ontologist’s more fundamental quantifier is a restriction of her opponent’s quantifier. This response takes seriously the intuition that there is something wrong with the ontological disputes, but does not entail dismissivism.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
RETQIT
Upload history
Archival date: 2020-01-21
View other versions
Added to PP index
2019-12-19

Total views
192 ( #30,860 of 2,448,286 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
41 ( #15,746 of 2,448,286 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.