Hick, pluralism and category mistake

International Journal of Hekmat 1 (1):101-114 (2009)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
John Hick’s theory concerning plurality of religions is an ontologic pluralism according to which all religions are authentic ways for man to attain the "real an sich". Gods of religions are real as perceived and veridical hallucinations; while the “real an sich” has ineffable substantial and trans-categorical properties. Hick’s view suffers from several problems. As a second order analysis of religions, Hick’s view is not a correct one. To reject naturalism, it falls into an epistemological circle, where distinction between formal and substantial properties fades away. It seems that Hick is captured by a category mistake in the presentation of his own theory concerning authenticity of all religions to attain the "real an sich"
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
REZHPA
Upload history
Archival date: 2017-02-26
View other versions
Added to PP index
2017-02-26

Total views
246 ( #20,501 of 54,683 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
41 ( #17,425 of 54,683 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.