Hick, pluralism and category mistake

International Journal of Hekmat 1 (1):101-114 (2009)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
John Hick’s theory concerning plurality of religions is an ontologic pluralism according to which all religions are authentic ways for man to attain the "real an sich". Gods of religions are real as perceived and veridical hallucinations; while the “real an sich” has ineffable substantial and trans-categorical properties. Hick’s view suffers from several problems. As a second order analysis of religions, Hick’s view is not a correct one. To reject naturalism, it falls into an epistemological circle, where distinction between formal and substantial properties fades away. It seems that Hick is captured by a category mistake in the presentation of his own theory concerning authenticity of all religions to attain the "real an sich"
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2017-02-26
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Dialetheism.Berto, Francesco; Priest, Graham & Weber, Zach
Ineffability.Hick, John
.ʻAlī, Ḥasanʹzādah Mīr & Allāh, ʻAbd

View all 9 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
171 ( #22,190 of 46,466 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
83 ( #7,993 of 46,466 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.