Can Atheism Be Epistemically Responsible When So Many People Believe in God?

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Nowadays the argument for the existence of God based on the common consent of mankind is taken to be so bad that contemporary atheists do not even bother to mention it. And it seems very few theists think that the argument is worth defending. In this paper I shall argue to the contrary: not only is the argument better than usually thought, but widespread belief in God constitutes a prima facie defeater for every reasonable atheist.
No keywords specified (fix it)
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-03-14
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Peer Disagreement and Higher Order Evidence.Thomas Kelly - 2010 - In Alvin I. Goldman & Dennis Whitcomb (eds.), Social Epistemology: Essential Readings. Oxford University Press. pp. 183--217.
On Epistemology.Zagzebski, Linda

View all 8 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
122 ( #24,790 of 43,724 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
52 ( #13,891 of 43,724 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.