Ambition, Modesty, and Performative Inconsistency

In Jens Peter Brune Brune, Robert Stern & Micha H. Werner (eds.), Transcendental Arguments in Moral Theory. Berlin: de Gruyter. pp. 25-45 (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
This chapter argues that the distinction between ambitious and modest transcendental arguments, developed and deployed by various authors in the wake of Stroud’s influential critique of transcendental reasoning, may be pointless when applied to transcendental arguments from performative inconsistency that have moral statements as their conclusions. If moral truth is assertorically constrained, then any modest moral transcendental argument from performative inconsistency can be converted into an ambitious moral transcendental argument. The chapter provides an account of performative inconsistency and suggests an alternative to the widespread reading of transcendental conditionals in terms of an ‘if-then’-sentences whose antecedents express a proposition to the effect that some x is possible and whose consequents express a statement to the effect that some y is actual.
Categories
PhilPapers/Archive ID
RHMAMA
Revision history
Archival date: 2016-09-26
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
The Sources of Normativity.Korsgaard, Christine M.

View all 14 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2016-09-26

Total views
212 ( #18,505 of 46,152 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
73 ( #9,602 of 46,152 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.