Is evidence from social psychology and neuroscience relevant to philosophical debates in normative ethics?

Annali di Studi Religiosi 14:145-165 (2014)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
This article presents some considerations concerning the relevance of empirical research from neuroscience and social psychology for philosophical debates in normative ethics. While many authors hold that there are findings and theories from those fields that are relevant to normative ethics, it often remains unclear precisely how this relevance relation is to be construed and spelled out. The article critically discusses various proposals which have recently been made in this regard by philosophers, psychologists, and neuroscientists.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
RHMIEF-2
Upload history
First archival date: 2015-11-21
Latest version: 1 (2016-09-17)
View other versions
Added to PP index
2014-05-06

Total views
335 ( #18,942 of 2,446,288 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
19 ( #34,006 of 2,446,288 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.