Arguments in a Sartorial Mode, or the Asymmetries of History and Philosophy of Science

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
History of science and philosophy of science are not perfectly complementary disciplines. Several important asymmetries govern their relationship. These asymmetries, concerning levels of analysis, evidence, theories, writing, and training show that to be a decent philosopher of science is more difficult than being a decent historian. But to be a good historian-well, the degree of difficulty is reversed.
No keywords specified (fix it)
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2019-09-25
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
84 ( #37,853 of 52,980 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
18 ( #32,427 of 52,980 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.