DNA, Masterpieces, and Abortion: Shifting the Grounds of the Debate

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Writers, philosophers, and theologians have oft made the comparison between being a mature human being and a masterpiece work of art or design. Employing the analogy between the creation of artistic value and the creation of full-fledged human value, this paper stakes out a middle ground between pro-choice and pro-life by considering a more general account of value and the relationship between being a potential X and a mature implementation of X's potential. I argue that the value of a potential X is a function of a number of factors, most importantly, what I call the "accessibility relation" between a potential X and a full-fledged instantiation of this potential. The value is as much intrinsic to the “seed” as to some future implementation of the seed’s potential. This approach inclines even a secular humanist to reasonably confer a significant degree of moral value to a human conceptus, and even more to an early term fetus.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
RICDMA
Upload history
Archival date: 2015-11-21
View other versions
Added to PP index
2009-05-14

Total views
655 ( #8,605 of 2,448,926 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
32 ( #20,732 of 2,448,926 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.